Community Page
- blog.slaven.net.au Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- This prestigious jewelry line is designed by the legendary Elsa Peretti, an Italian jewelry designer who first tied the Tiffany cadre in 1974. For more than 100 being, <a...
- Dennis Wurster, I am having the same problem. I wonder if it worked well if you schedule REAL cronjob to run wp-pseudo-cron (/blog/wp-cron.php as I assume) each minute/hour? So that cron...
- What I can say is very nice and helpful as well as informative post...really help me very much more!! Thanks.. Cheers, <a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow">Buat...
- ่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่่ghhhhhhhhhhhh
- The brilliant and shining links of london with brightly colored <a href=http://www.londonoflinks.co.uk/>Links of London</a> eye-catching. Your face shape and hair style, can wear red...
Jump to original thread »
How’s that for an inflammatory title?
Let me prefix this post with a brief disclaimer. I like Microsoft’s .NET platform. C# is a great language to work in, it’s flexible & powerful. Plus, the .NET framewo ... Continue reading »
Let me prefix this post with a brief disclaimer. I like Microsoft’s .NET platform. C# is a great language to work in, it’s flexible & powerful. Plus, the .NET framewo ... Continue reading »
1 year ago
1 year ago
Honestly, I like ASP.NET a lot. The basic templating system, that lets you manipulate the ASP.NET document at the DOM level is fantastic.
The Web Controls, however, are retarded. They make ASP.NET seem like an advanced incarnation of 1990's web construction rather than the kind of modern framework application that good programmers are building in Ruby, PHP, Java and other languages -- it's like they're trying to compete with Cold Fusion, not the living languages that people are using now.
I 'd love to have something that works like Web Controls, but the viewstate concept just isn't compatible with the modern approach that people call MVC: real internet applications need the ability to display different 'views' based on form input and database results -- to carry information through a series of related forms. Viewstate is completely incompatible with that, not to mind the browser back button. Reliable applications keep ~most~ form state in hidden variables, or implement something that has the same semantics: there's a very limited amount of stuff that you can keep in session scope if you want to make apps that really work.
Perhaps Microsoft's MVC framework for ASP.NET will improve the situation, or perhaps somebody will make something that looks a lot like the web controls but that actually works.
1 year ago
1 year ago
And on your point of "you're doing it wrong" by setting the visibility, your blanket statement is not accurate. If the div contains ASP.NET validation controls, you need to set the visible property on the div. If you just change the display style, you'll end up with a validation control hidden but preventing (possibly) the page from being posted. That's a very bad and confusing thing.