<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Development on a shoestring - Latest Comments in Always implement the ToString() method</title><link>http://slaven.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:14:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Always implement the ToString() method</title><link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2007/03/20/always-implement-the-tostring-method/#comment-1279592</link><description>Try also [DebuggerDisplay] which does similar without having to add code.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.diagnostics.debuggerdisplayattribute.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mfhobbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 22:14:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Always implement the ToString() method</title><link>http://blog.slaven.net.au/archives/2007/03/20/always-implement-the-tostring-method/#comment-1279590</link><description>I often find myself expanding individual nodes of quickwatch lists of objects, wasting lots of time.  Your ToString() idea is a great one.  I'm sure I will use it in the future.  Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:40:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>